Any movement of human thought is due toaccepted information, and any action is the result of reflecting the received information. Between perception and reaction lies the accumulated life experience, knowledge and skills: receiving and sending information is, first of all, an unconscious process. A lot of people do on a full machine.
The connection between the unconscious and the conscious is so great that it does not cause doubts: all the perceived person, realizing what he is doing, not knowing how, puts them in regular numbers in his own experience and knowledge.
Receiving and sending information is important
Computer technology has reached great heights,created a lot of perspective forms of presentation and algorithms of information processing, but all this still does not look like it has settled in human existence.
Using any program, a person, first of all,uses the experience and knowledge of the developer, understands it and acts on its algorithms. It is not comfortable. A person is not a user, it became customary to call those who more or less mastered the keyboard and became close to computer science. But even becoming a user, a person uses all the tools available to him in the best way for him. No one pays attention to such a disparaging attitude of software developers and information systems to their clients.
Adequate and absolutely real will be the attitude of the person to the developer of the program, who believes that the processing and transmission of information is his element.
The user is almost always not a "kettle"
Receiving information by any program is a specific algorithm, and depending on how the user performs their part of the dialog, it depends what the program will send it as a result.
Here the formula "receiving and sending information" -it's not at all like it is customary, but as someone has established it. The process of developing the program is influenced by various specialists, but the end result is created by the programmer (developer).
The result is the professional experiencecreators and accumulated - third-party developers, because they use their experience on the following issues: storage and transmission of information, its analysis, the formation of solutions, the output of rules and so on.
The mind is sometimes incomprehensible, as well as who could have guessedthose or other forms of dialogue, which are treated by another program, site, script, user's information system, or rather, a person who has achieved social prosperity, that is, he is able to receive and use information in an unofficial way.
The prism of knowledge of some unknown programmerteaches someone who knows how to live, what to do, how to receive and send information - it's like in the good old days: the eggs, by miraculous inspiration, decided to cock the cock as the seeds peck.
A programmer is a work, not an experiment on information, its sources and consumers.
But the programmer is rarely a specialist.
More recently, in the 90s, in addition to the revival andsocial upheavals, in the social space, on the then narrow information spaces, were dominated by the classic writing: the program, regardless of the writing style, included the task, the customer and the programmer-performer.
Заказчик предоставлял предметную область, а the programmer formalized it and made an algorithm that clearly needed to be redone many times until the process bothered one of the parties. However, all were in business.
The appearance of object-orientedProgramming gave a chance to put everything on its head. However, the public consciousness was not ready to control the process. Naturally, programmers very effectively put fresh and promising ideas into the classic, familiar framework.
Instead of manipulating objectsthe customer, the modern program manipulates the windows, buttons, scripts, rules and other things available to the programmer. The customer again does not understand anything, again the programs are being rewritten, being finalized during the whole period of their existence. Again, all in the business.
Dynamics of opportunity
Information was always accompanied by adequatetools. Apparently, this is not from the sphere that is known, but each stage of human development had an information space and means of manipulating it. No one has managed to manage information at all, but to influence such a process as receiving and sending information is in any program (in any private sphere) without any problems. There would be a desire among the parties to the process ...
