Virtually every person in his life entersin any production relations, in particular at work, because this implies the interaction of people in the process of manufacturing, consumption, distribution and, of course, the exchange of material goods. Together, the productive forces and production relations are a mode of production determined historically.
This interaction forms a certain foundation,on which the activities of enterprises have been maintained for many years. However, production relations have always engaged in polemics with forces. At first, people stimulated the development of technology and technology, which greatly increased the power of the productive forces and led to a reduction in the need for relations. This cycle is repeated periodically in modern activities. That is, people periodically become hostages of their own initiative.
Under the communist system, experts stillconfirmed the need for an equilibrium between these elements. Finally, they recognized that relations are also important for improving the well-being of the population and the successful operation of enterprises, as well as for the strength. Even during the development of Marxist teachings, the dialectic of productive forces and production relations was revealed. A law was published that said that the nature of the relationship always corresponds to the degree of development of forces in the production process. Thus, in each historical period, a special method of producing material goods was used, to which specific relationships were fully inherent, fully corresponding to the given time. Only in this way was it possible to achieve unity and coherence in the system of output of goods and services.
One of the most important elements of this systemthe relations of ownership of the means of production are considered, since they are the main link in the chain of communication between manufacturers and fixed assets. This helps to achieve the main goal of any enterprise and explains the existence of other types of relationships. Socialist property presupposed the state ownership of all property involved in productive activities, which prevented the social stratification of society. After all, with such a system there were no private owners, which means that there was no enslavement of one person to another. All were equal before the authorities.
As mentioned above, the production relationshipthe process of distribution and exchange of the products of labor. This movement can not occur without the interaction of people. At the stage of production of finished products, relations arise between the firm and suppliers of raw materials, the manager and subordinates, between representatives of different departments of the same company. At the stage of distribution and sale of goods or services, there are relations with counterparties who are direct purchasers of material goods, usually with a view to their further resale.
Industrial relations have characteristicfeatures. For example, they are formed regardless of the will and desire of the person, and people interact, because they have certain skills and knowledge in demand in this industry. The degree of development of the productive forces has a direct effect. It is this factor that is considered determinative when choosing a particular type of relationship.
In conclusion, we can conclude thatproduction relations are a form of interaction of people in the process of manufacturing material goods. Without these relations, it is impossible to develop any industry, and consequently, they play a crucial role in the economic life of the country.
