In the era of the development of nuclear weapons and nuclearenergy is not easy to stay away from what is happening, and therefore the radiation safety standards have become particularly relevant. Their knowledge may help to adequately assess the situation that may arise in the event of a nuclear catastrophe. Despite the fact that the cold war was long over, the most dangerous weapons of mass destruction did not cease to exist, and the peaceful atom often led to horrible consequences. The most tragic example is the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, when permissible radiation rates were overestimated tenfold, if not taken into account at all. Many liquidators and victims of this virtually knew nothing.
Moving from generalized knowledge of these norms,it is necessary to directly characterize and specify them. The majority of reference books treats radiation safety standards as the limiting doses of radiation to humans by radiation, which are considered relatively harmless to health. In scientific understanding, they are advisory in nature. Mainly, such standards are set relative to the summed dose of radiation from all sources of radiation, which affects a person during a year.
A more objective assessment of the effects of radiation onA specific living organism is carried out taking into account the so-called equivalent (effective) dose. It is determined by multiplying the absorbed dose (in rad) by the coefficient of radiation quality (QC); its non-system unit is considered biological. equiv. glad (ber). According to the SI system, the equivalent dose is expressed in sieverts (Sv). 1 Sv = 1 J / kg = 1 Gy, 1 Sv = 100 ber. The permissible rate of radiation in accordance with fixed standards for humans is not more than 0.1 ber (with the exception of natural sources of radiation). Professionals working with artificial sources of radiation (employees of nuclear power plants, for example) should not receive exposure to more than 5 ber per year.