Many people today have taken the habit of usingIn speech, a huge number of words of foreign origin. For example, using the word "a priori", its meaning is understood not by many. In one of the explanations concerning this word, there is the following: “a statement made before gaining experience”. And an example is set: “A friend is just crazy about horse racing. Tomorrow is the decisive race. A priori he will be on the hippodrome! ”Is the use of the word appropriate in this case? A moot point.
Ведь, как высказался блогер выше, слово указывает that the conclusion is not based on experience. And in this case, we see that the assumption is just based on the fact that as a result of the experience gained (a friend always goes to the races, he has not yet missed a single important run), the friend makes certain conclusions. Therefore, in this context, "a priori" meaning can have only with a touch of humor or a slight ridicule. Thus, the person, trying to explain the meaning of the expression, contradicts himself.
Another statement is based on the fact that"A priori" meaning is the initial knowledge that does not require evidence. An example is given of the spherical shape of the Earth. The very definition of the word can be called true, but with an example again a misfire.
How many centuries have people considered Earth to be flat,It was really a priori for almost everyone. But there was one, named Copernicus, for whom the opinion of all meant nothing. And proved that the Earth is round. Here is a priori ...
Or about parallel lines. Earlier it was possible to say: a priori, that they will not intersect! And today it is unlikely that anyone will argue that the intersection of parallel lines is impossible.
The modern world is changing at tremendous speed.precisely because of those people for whom the word "a priori" does not exist. The value of experience for them is everything. They fry cucumbers and cook garlic ice cream, try to build their bodies so that they fit in a meter cube, climb on the cliffs and descend into the depths of the oceans.
А другая часть населения априори утверждает, что it's impossible. Without testing, without making experiments, simply because many people think so, he argues a priori. What this means, we have already figured out. But what part of speech can a word appear in a sentence?
More often this word has a sense of adverb.It seems to replace the words “in advance,” “speculatively”, “originally” or expressions that are circumstances such as “not requiring evidence”, “without reliance on facts”. More rarely, in Russian, this word appears as a substantive adverb, that is, the indeclinable noun of the neuter gender.
A priori knowledge today is a deep affairsubjective. If earlier, almost 50 years ago, certain dogmas existed, axioms that did not need to be proved, but should be blindly taken for granted, then today all this does not exist. If schoolchildren in the last century would have asked: “Are there ghosts?”, Then more than half would have answered a priori: “Of course not! And there is no witchcraft, and God, and transformations! ”But today even scientists find it difficult to give an unequivocal and confident answer to this question. Yes that make it difficult! There are research institutes that study what in the past did not exist a priori and therefore did not require study.
Laughing at the "conspirator" grandmother –healerswater, a priori claiming that all this is a hoax. And today, scientists froze different types of water (and including the one who spoke) and made an analysis of their structures. Amazing The facts have destroyed a priori statement. The conspiracy water has the correct structure of a hexagonal snowflake, the same that the spring one possesses. But the water from the tap structure has a broken.
Так что сегодня смешно что-либо утверждать a priori. Progress does not believe anyone's word, he still "tries to taste". Ruins dogmas, crumples axioms, sets its own rules. But the word "a priori" in the speech of some still remains, a beautiful foreign word.
